36-year-old woman:
– With dyspnea and elevated D-dimers
What is the cause of the dyspnea?
Acute segmental pulmonary embolism
What is the cause of the consolidation?
Pulmonary infarction: typically wedge-shaped with a broad pleural base
36-year-old woman:
– With dyspnea and elevated D-dimers
Acute segmental pulmonary embolism
Pulmonary infarction: typically wedge-shaped with a broad pleural base
A 24-year-old female patient with headache. What do you see?
Multinodular and vacuolating neuronal tumor (MVNT): Cortical ribbon-juxtacortical T2 hyperintense (a-b) round to oval nodular lesions, not suppressed on FLAIR images (c) and usually no enhancement (d) may show fair enhancement rarely, without diffusion restriction (not shown)
Dear Friends,
Today’s case is a PA chest radiograph for knee surgery in a 28-year-old man.
What do you see?
Findings: PA chest radiograph shows an osteochondroma in the right humerus (A, yellow arrow). There are two more in the anterior arch of the left fifth rib and in the proximal end of the right clavicle (A, red arrows).
They are better seen in the cone down views (B-D, arrows).
The first and only diagnosis that comes to mind is multiple osteochondromatosis, confirmed with views of the lower extremities (E-G).
Final diagnosis: Multiple osteochondromatosis.
Most of you did very well in this case. Congratulations to Mauro, who was the first and to Kaushalya and Ali who made back-to-back diagnosis in a five-minute interval.
Teaching point: remember to look at the bones of the chest, especially when taking an examination. It may surprise the examiner and win you a few extra points.
Left side of the neck.
Multiple enlarged neck clustered lymph nodes, with some of them showing necrosis.
Infectious lymphadenitis: such as TB or pyogenic lymphadenitis.
Metastasis: particularly from head and neck malignancies.
Treated lymphoma or lymphoma in immune compromised patient.
TB lymphadenitis
57-year-old man with left iliac fossa pain:
What do you see?
* Infiltration/haziness around colon descendens with central fat density
* No or only moderate (secondary) inflammation of colonic wall
Epiploic appendagitis
* Diverticulitis mimic, but self-limiting
* No-touch-lesion!
Dear Friends,
Today I am showing the PA radiograph of an 82-year-old woman. Preoperatory for cataracts.
What do you think about the right hilum?
1. Calcified TB nodes
2. Sarcoidosis
3. Amyloid
4. None of the above
More images will be shown on Wednesday.
Dear friends, showing today PA and lateral radiographs taken two years earlier. Hope they help.
Findings: Initial PA radiograph shows opacities in the right hilum (A, circle), unchanged in comparison with a previous film taken two years earlier (B, circle).
The clue to the diagnosis lies in the density and appearance of the opacities. They are denser than the typical lymph node calcifications, suggesting that they are metallic. In addition, some of them look tubular or branching (C, red arrows). A lateral view taken two years earlier confirms dense lineal and branching opacities in right lung (D, arrows).
The combination of linear and branching metallic opacities suggests that they are either in the bronchi (previous bronchography) or within the pulmonary vessels (embolism after vertebroplasty o treatment of AV malformation). See Diploma # 44.
Lateral view of the lumbar spine shows surgical changes with vertebroplasty of L3 to L5 and leakage of the cement into the epidural veins (E, arrows), better seen in the sagittal CT (F, arrows).
Unenhanced CT confirms multiple cement emboli in the pulmonary arteries (G-J, circles)
Final diagnosis: cement embolization of the lung after vertebroplasty
I must mention Olena and Ayudi who suggested amyloid and broncholithiasis but failed to notice the metallic opacity of the findings.
Teaching point: Consider previous vertebroplasty when you see metallic opacities in the lungs. It is a common complication.
This is the third and last case of the musculoskeletal series. Check the first one and second one on this blog.
What do you see on the following images?
Osteoblastoma: Osteoblastoma is histologically similar to osteoid osteoma but they are larger (usually accepted more than 1 cm), often involving the posterior column
89-year-old female patient with aplastic anemia. Showing CT images without contrast media. What do you see?
Dear Friends,
this is the last case of the first semester. Will meet again in September.
Wish all of you a very happy summer vacation!
This is a new “art of interpretation” case. Radiographs belong to a 40-year-old woman with mild cough.
What do you see?
Diagnosis:
1. Chronic TB changes
2. AV malformation
3. Bronchial atresia
4. Any of the above
To refresh your memory, remember that interpreting a chest radiograph involves three basic steps:
1. Gather information. Examine the radiographs carefully and collect all the pertinent information. Remember that overlooking visible findings is the main cause of errors.
2. Analyze the findings. Once collected, the findings should be properly evaluated, and an opinion should be offered.
3. Decide on the next step to reach the diagnosis.
In this patient the lateral view is unremarkable.
All relevant findings are seen in the PA radiograph:
1. Tubular branching opacities in the left upper lung (A, red arrows)
2. Increased lucency of left upper lung (A, circle)
3. Negative finding: the left hilum is in its normal position.
1. Branching tubular opacities have a limited differential diagnosis: either they are pulmonary vessels or mucous-filled dilated bronchi.
2. Hyperlucent lung is a reliable sign of lung disease when complemented with an expiration film to demonstrate air-trapping.
3. The normal position of the left hilum is a negative finding that excludes a fibrotic process in the LUL (I.e. chronic TB), which should cause upper retraction of the hilum.
The combination of a lucent lung lesion with branching tubular opacities points towards an obstructive process of a segmental bronchus with mucous impaction (Obstruction of a lobar bronchus would cause lobar collapse instead of increased lucency).
TUBULAR BRANCHING OPACITIES + INCREASED LUNG LUCENCY = SEGMENTAL BRONCHIAL OBSTRUCTION
Once segmental bronchial obstruction is suspected in the chest radiograph, the best procedure to confirm it is an enhanced chest CT with expiratory views. In this case it shows attenuated upper lobe vessels (B, arrows) and obvious mucous impactions (B-C, red arrows).
Axial CT with lung window confirms the increased lucency of the apical-posterior segment of the RUL (D, circle)
Inspiration/expiration axial CT views (E-F) confirm segmental air trapping on the left.
Bronchoscopy did not show any inflammatory or tumoral changes in the LUL bronchus. The orifice of the apical-posterior segment was missing.
Final diagnosis: bronchial atresia of apical-posterior segment of LUL
In my experience, bronchial atresia is the most common congenital lung malformation seen in adults. Congenital bronchial atresia results from proximal interruption of a segmental bronchus, which causes overinflation of the affected segment and secondary mucus impaction. Chest radiography shows a focal hyperlucent area with internal mucus impaction. CT depicts these findings to better advantage. Inspiration and expiration views help to confirm air-trapping. In case of doubt, bronchoscopy excludes other causes of bronchial obstruction.
Congenital bronchial atresia may present different appearances, as shown in the following case of one of our X-ray technicians.
30-year-old female, asymptomatic. PA chest radiograph (A) shows hyperlucent left lung with discrete dextroposition of the heart. Expiration film (B) shows air-trapping on the left with deviation of the mediastinum towards the right. Note a thick tubular shadow in the left lower lung (A-B, red arrows), compatible with bronchial impaction. The findings are suggestive of congenital bronchial atresia
Axial and coronal enhanced CT show increased lucency of the posterior segments of LLL with a central mucous impaction (C-D, red arrows)
Decreased vascularity of LLL and central mucous impaction (E-F, red arrows) are better demonstrated in the MIP reconstruction.
Coronal view eleven years later show that air is now present within the dilated bronchus, confirming the diagnosis (G-H, circles) .
Dr. Pepe’s teaching point:
Hyperlucent lung with mucous impaction are the hallmark of congenital bronchial atresia.