Neuroradiology #39

Clinical Data

40-year-old female presents with:
  • Fever

  • Progressive headache

  • Confusion in the last two days

  • Previous medical history was unremarkable

  • CT brain without contrast was performed in the emergency department

CT images:

Unenhanced CT
Unenhanced CT
What are the most important findings on CT?
  • Subtle hypodensity in the medial temporal lobe on the right side.

  • Sparing of the basal nuclei on the right side.

What are your next steps?
  • Immediately call the ordering physician to communicate that the imaging (and clinical) findings are suggestive of Herpes Simplex Encephalitis.

    • This will prompt the clinician to directly start with an antiretroviral agent (acyclovir) if not started already and to perform a lumbar puncture to confirm HSV in CSF.

MRI was performed:

T2
Coronal T2 FLAIR
T1 + C
What are the findings on MRI?
  • T2 hyperintense regions with swelling/oedema and involvement of both white matter and cortex centered around the right sylvian fissure with involvement of the right temporal, frontal and insular region. Subtle patchy and leptomeningeal enhancement in the right temporal lobe can be seen.

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Herpes Simplex Encephalitis

  • The clinical picture is already highly suggestive of this diagnosis with supporting imaging findings. The diagnosis was confirmed with positive PCR for HSV-1 in CSF.

  • Typical imaging findings of herpes encephalitis are T2(/FLAIR) hyperintense swollen areas of cortex and white matter with bilateral but asymmetrical involvement of the fronto-temporo-insular regions. Characteristic is sparing of the lentiform nuclei, which distinguishes it from ischemia due to vessel occlusion. Diffusion restriction and hemorrhage can be present.

  • This is a radiological emergency and the phone must be picked up directly to alert the clinician and to prevent significant mortality and morbidity.

Reference:

Neuroradiology #38

Clinical Data

35-year-old male presents with:
  • Progressive headache and ataxia
  • Previous medical history was unremarkable
  • MRI brain was performed
T1 + C
T1 + C
T1 C+
T1 C+
T2
T2
T2
T2
T2 FLAIR
T2 FLAIR
What do you see?
  • Cystic lesion with an enhancing lesion in the posterior fossa on the left side. No enhancement of the cystic wall. Discrete flow voids in the solid nodule.
  • Relevant mass effect with compression on the 4th ventricle and obstructing supratentorial hydrocephalus.
What is your differential diagnosis?
  • The differential diagnosis of a cyst with an enhancing mural nodule in the posterior fossa includes hemangioblastoma, pilocytic astrocytoma, ganglioglioma and cystic metastasis.
What are the most likely diagnoses?
  • When a cystic lesion with a mural nodule is encountered in the posterior fossa, the most likely diagnosis is hemangioblastoma in an adult in the absence of a primary tumor elsewhere. The imaging findings support hemangioblastoma, since the mural nodule shows flow voids on T2 and no enhancing cystic wall. Typically, the cystic wall of hemangioblastoma does not enhance, while a subtle enhancing wall can be discerned in pilocytic astrocytomas.
  • The majority of hemangioblastomas occur spontaneously. In case of multiple hemangioblastomas, think about Von Hippel-Lindau syndrome.
  • Reference:

  • Raz et al. Cyst with a mural nodule tumor of the brain. Cancer Imaging. 2012 Aug 10;12(1):237–244. doi: 10.1102/1470-7330.2012.0028

Paediatric #1

Premature baby (gestation week 33) + 0

What are the findings?

What are the findings?

Nasogastric tube positioned in the left upper quadrant. The stomach and proximal duodenum are distended and filled with gas (double bubble sign). The remainder of the abdomen shows no gas-filled bowel loops.

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Obstruction of the proximal duodenum (duodenal atresia)

Possible causes:
Duodenal web, duodenal atresia, annular pancreas, midgut volvulus, retroperitoneal tumour
Require surgery within 24 h

Treatment in this case: Surgery (duodeno-duodenostomy) the same day

Abdominal #30

59-year-old female:
– Presented with weight loss (35 kg weight loss in 1 year)
– Diagnosed with celiac disease 2 years ago
– Laboratory findings: low levels of sodium, potassium, chloride, and calcium in the blood

What do you see?

What so you see?

Multiple mesenteric lymphadenopathies that contain fat-fluid levels (red arrows)

Splenic atrophy (red arrows)

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome

Teaching points

– Cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome is associated with celiac disease

– It is characterized by the triad:
(a) low attenuation lymphadenopathies that may contain fat-fluid levels
(b) splenic atrophy
(c) villous atrophy

– Cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome is associated with poor prognosis

– Many patients die of complications of cachexia and intestinal hemorrhage. Patients are prone to sepsis, often due to infections commonly associated with clinical hyposplenism, such as pneumococcal infection

– Treatment: Correction of electrolyte abnormalities, strict gluten-free diet, steroid therapy

– In our case, US-guided biopsy of one of the mesenteric lymphadenopathies was performed. Histopathologic examination showed acellular, chylous fluid. It was negative for malignancy or mycobacterial infection. The diagnosis of cavitating mesenteric lymph node syndrome was made in the clinical setting of celiac disease

Urogenital #1

30-year-old female patient:
– With cervical cancer
– Recent hysterectomy with bilateral adnexectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy
– Urinary tract infection with pyuria
– Persistent pelvic fluid collection between the vaginal stump and rectum (asterisk)
– Contrast-enhanced CT (portal venous phase) shows the right ureter merging with the collection (arrow)

What should be done next?

What should be done next?

Scan in the excretory (urographic) phase

*Usually performed 10 minutes after contrast injection, but useful even if done a couple of hours later (such as in this case)

What is the diagnosis?

What is the diagnosis?

Urinoma – iatrogenic

What should be the next step?

What should be the next step?

Urology consultation
Double-J ureteral stent was placed

Abdominal #29

73-year-old female patient:
* Abdominal pain
* Suspicion for ileus

Findings

Small bowel obstruction, with small bowel wall distension and transition point in the pelvis. At the point of transition there is a metal structure visible with the lumen of the bowel
No signs of bowel wall ischemia, no perforation

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Acute small bowel obstruction due to migrated stomach tube plate

Requires surgery within 24 h
Possible complications: Perforation, abscess, ischemic changes
Treatment in this case: Laparotomy and surgical removal of the metal plate

Abdominal #28

2-year-old girl:
– Intermittent abdominal pain during the last 3 days
– Ultrasound exam of the abdomen was performed

Right lower quadrant images
Right lower quadrant images
What is the diagnosis?

What is the diagnosis?

Ileocolic intussusception

Intussusception

– Most common in small children (6 months–2 years)
– Proximal bowel (intussusceptum) invaginates into the distal bowel (intussuscipiens), most commonly ileocecal (90%)
– Classic triad of intermittent abdominal pain, vomiting and palpable right upper quadrant mass
– Red-currant jelly stool in late phase (signs of ischemia)
– Ultrasound is the imaging modality of choice
a) axial: alternating hyper- and hypoechoic concentric layers (target sign), sometimes with hyperechoic crescent-like mesentery (crescent in a doughnut sign)
b) longitudinal: pseudokidney sign (hilum = hyperechoic mesentery, cortex = hypoechoic bowel)
-US can identify lead points (e.g. lymph nodes, tumor, Meckel diverticulum), presence of trapped or free fluid

What is the next best step in the management?

What is the next best step in the management?

Imaging-guided reduction
– avoids surgery
– absolute contraindications: perforation, peritonitis, hemodynamic instability
– pneumatic or hydrostatic – increases the intraluminal pressure in the colon
– under fluoroscopic or ultrasound guidance (US better because of the lack of ionizing radiation)

Hydrostatic reduction under ultrasound guidance was performed

Fluid-distended cecum with gaping ileocecal valve and reflux of fluid in the terminal ileum as a marker of successful reduction

Reference

Pušnik L, Slak P, Nikšić S, Winant AJ, Lee EY, Plut D. Ultrasound-guided hydrostatic reduction of intussusception: comparison of success rates between subspecialized pediatric radiologists and non-pediatric radiologists or radiology residents. Eur J Pediatr. 2023 Jul;182(7):3257-3264. doi: 10.1007/s00431-023-04987-1. Epub 2023 May 6. PMID: 37148276; PMCID: PMC10354123.

Abdominal #27

78-year-old male:

-Presented with fatigue and weight loss
-Laboratory findings: low levels of total protein and albumin in the blood

What do you see?

What do you see?

What so you see?

– Periaortic soft tissue (red arrows)
– Bilateral pleural effusions (green arrows)
– Bilateral perirenal soft tissue thickening (blue arrows)

– Bilateral perirenal soft tissue thickening extending to the renal sinus, encasing the renal arteries and veins (blue arrows) There is mild dilatation of bilateral renal calyces from the retroperitoneal infiltration
– Soft tissue encasement of the descending aorta (red arrows)
– Left renal cyst (green arrow)

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Erdheim-Chester disease

Teaching points
– Erdheim-Chester disease (ECD) is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytosis characterized by multiorgan xanthomatous infiltration

– The diagnosis is based on clinical, imaging, and histopathological features

– Patients with ECD may present with bone pain, diabetes insipidus, exophthalmos, constitutional symptoms, interstitial lung disease, ureteral obstruction, renal impairment, cardiac dysfunction and tamponade, cerebellar or pyramidal symptoms, and xanthelasma.

– ECD has a wide range of manifestations throughout the body

– Skeletal involvement is the most common. At imaging, there is bilateral patchy or diffuse symmetric osteosclerosis of the lower extremity metaphyses and diaphyses, with relative sparing of the subchondral surfaces. Radiographically, cortical thickening, coarsened trabeculae, medullary sclerosis, and loss of the corticomedullary differentiation may be demonstrated

– Kidneys and retroperitoneum are often involved

– CT and MRI may show ‘hairy kidney sign’ that is demonstrated as irregular symmetric infiltration of the bilateral perirenal and posterior pararenal spaces

– Obstructive uropathy may result from medial displacement of the ureters

– Periaortic soft tissue is often shown, which is known as ‘coated aorta sign’

– Pulmonary involvement has been reported in 15-35% of patients with ECD and includes smooth interlobular septal thickening, micronodules, ground-glass opacities, thickening of interlobar fissures, and parenchymal consolidation

– Chest radiographs will often show interstitial edema pattern with cardiomegaly and pleural effusions that do not respond to diuretics 

– Orbital and central nervous system involvement are common findings. Retrobulbar masses that can cause proptosis and optic nerve edema may be present

– The hypothalamic-pituitary axis is the most common site affected within the central nervous system. Absence of the normal T1 hyperintense signal of the neurohypophysis occurs with enhancing nodular soft tissue of the pituitary stalk and posterior pituitary gland that results in central diabetes insipidus. Intra- and extra-axial cerebral and spinal lesions may be observed

– Treatment: Targeted therapy such as BRAF inhibitors, MEK inhibitors, interferon alfa, steroid therapy, radiotherapy, and surgery may be performed. There is no known cure for ECD and historically the prognosis has been poor 

– In our case, a biopsy from the perirenal soft tissue was performed. The histopathological findings confirmed the diagnosis of ECD

Chest and Thorax #1

56-year-old male patient:
* After kidney transplantion presented with cough

What are the findings?

What are the findings?

Multiple intrapulmonary consolidations with peripheral ground-glass opacities.
No bronchial obstruction.
No pathologically enlarged lymph nodes

What is the most likely diagnosis?

What is the most likely diagnosis?

Fungal infection (Rhizopus infection)

Fungal infections in immunocompromised patients may manifest as intrapulmonary nodules or consolidations with peripheral ground glass opacities. May lead to cavitation, pseudoaneurysm formation and bleeding

Treatment in this case: Anti-fungal systemic therapy
Patient died 5 months thereafter from pulmonary artery aneurysmal bleeding

Abdominal #26

17-year-old male patient:
* Cholestatic jaundice, otherwise healthy
* Ultrasound showed extensive biliary tree dilatation

What should be done next?

What should be done next?

*MRCP
*Non-contrast MR of the abdomen with MRCP was performed

MRCP Images

MRCP Image

T2 images, axial and coronal

T2 Axial Image
T2 Coronal Image

DWI (left) with ADC map (right)

DWI with ADC map
Describe the findings

Describe the findings

*Marked biliary tree dilatation, common bile duct almost 2 cm wide with abrupt caliber change at the level of the pancreatic head
*No gallstones seen in biliary ducts or the distended gallbladder
*Diffuse pancreatic enlargement with marked restricted diffusion, no peripancreatic fat stranding, free fluid or collections
*Main pancreatic duct narrowing, barely visible

Differential diagnosis includes…

Differential diagnosis includes…

*Pancreatic cancer (especially diffuse infiltrative)
*Pancreatic lymphoma
*Autoimmune pancreatitis

Pancreatic biopsy confirmed autoimmune pancreatitis

Autoimmune pancreatitis is:
– Rare type of chronic pancreatitis
– Associated with IgG4-related sclerosing disease and autoimmune diseases
– Bulky appearance of the pancreas on imaging (“sausage shaped”), main pancreatic duct narrowing and absence of peripancreatic inflammatory changes seen in the acute pancreatitis
– Stenosis of the common bile duct is typical

What is the best course in treatment?

What is the best course in treatment?

Corticosteroids

Follow-up MRCP three weeks later showed improvement after corticosteroid therapy
Cholecystectomy was also performed

Pre-tearment
Follow-up after treatment